Monthly report · data as of 7 Oct 2026
Monthly report: May 2016
In May 2016, 75 restaurants had breaches (violations) at the smiley (smilefjes) inspections of Mattilsynet, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority – 3 of them serious – across 396 inspections (Mattilsynet, data as of 7 Oct 2026).
Compared with April 2016 that is 35 fewer restaurants (−32%).
Compared with before
| Figure | May 2016 | April 2016 | – |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspections | 396 | 495 | – |
| Restaurants inspected | 353 | 432 | – |
| Restaurants with breaches | 75 | 110 | – |
| With serious breaches | 3 | 5 | – |
| Findings (breaches) | 181 | 265 | – |
| Share with breaches | 21.2% | 25.5% | – |
Each restaurant is counted once per month, however many inspections or breaches it had. Share = restaurants with breaches of those inspected in the month.
Status today
- smiling face today – fixed 67 (89.3%)
- still a neutral or sad face 0 (0.0%)
- no longer listed 8 (10.7%)
Of the 75 restaurants with breaches in May 2016, 67 have a smiling face today (89.3%) – the breach was fixed at a later inspection. 0 still have a neutral or sad face, and 8 are no longer listed on the smiley site (data as of 7 Oct 2026).
Most common breaches in May 2016
| Requirement | Industry | Restaurants | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.2 Allergen labelling | Allergen labelling | 37 | 49.3% |
| 1.4 Internal control | Internal control and HACCP | 26 | 34.7% |
| 2.1 Premises – layout, standard, maintenance | Premises and maintenance | 25 | 33.3% |
| 2.3 Cleaning | Cleaning and hygiene | 17 | 22.7% |
| 3.9 Cooling of hot food | Temperature and refrigeration | 14 | 18.7% |
| 2.6 Hand washing | Cleaning and hygiene | 11 | 14.7% |
| 3.7 Cold chain | Temperature and refrigeration | 11 | 14.7% |
| 3.3 Risk of contamination | – | 10 | 13.3% |
| 3.6 Staff health and hygiene | – | 8 | 10.7% |
| 2.2 Premises – special requirements | Premises and maintenance | 6 | 8.0% |
Restaurants with breaches (grades 2–3) per requirement. Share = of the restaurants with breaches in the month. Industry = the Restoradar selection the requirement belongs to.
By industry
| Industry | Restaurants | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Allergen labelling | 37 | 49.3% |
| Temperature and refrigeration | 30 | 40.0% |
| Premises and maintenance | 28 | 37.3% |
| Internal control and HACCP | 26 | 34.7% |
| Cleaning and hygiene | 24 | 32.0% |
| Pest control | 2 | 2.7% |
Restaurants with breaches of the industry’s requirements in the month. A restaurant can count in several industries.
By county
| County | With breaches | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Agder | 3 | 4.0% |
| Akershus | 10 | 13.3% |
| Buskerud | 4 | 5.3% |
| Finnmark | 1 | 1.3% |
| Innlandet | 10 | 13.3% |
| Møre og Romsdal | 1 | 1.3% |
| Nordland | 3 | 4.0% |
| Oslo | 11 | 14.7% |
| Rogaland | 2 | 2.7% |
| Telemark | 3 | 4.0% |
| Troms | 5 | 6.7% |
| Trøndelag | 4 | 5.3% |
| Vestfold | 4 | 5.3% |
| Vestland | 11 | 14.7% |
| Østfold | 3 | 4.0% |
The county comes from the postcode. The links go to the industry pages for the county.
Municipalities with the most
| Municipality | County | With breaches |
|---|---|---|
| Oslo | Oslo | 11 |
| Bergen | Vestland | 7 |
| Tromsø | Troms | 5 |
| Asker | Akershus | 4 |
| Bærum | Akershus | 3 |
| Bodø | Nordland | 3 |
| Ullensaker | Akershus | 3 |
| Fredrikstad | Østfold | 2 |
| Sandefjord | Vestfold | 2 |
| Tønsberg | Vestfold | 2 |
Restaurants with breaches in May 2016 were in 43 municipalities. Counts only – Restoradar ranks no restaurants.
New restaurants in May 2016
Restoradar fetches new restaurants from the business register for the last 120 days, so the figure for May 2016 is no longer available.
Questions and answers
- How many restaurants had breaches at Mattilsynet in May 2016?
- In May 2016, 75 restaurants had breaches (violations) at the smiley (smilefjes) inspections of Mattilsynet, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority – 3 of them serious – across 396 inspections (Mattilsynet, data as of 7 Oct 2026). Compared with April 2016 that is 35 fewer restaurants (−32%).
- What was the most common breach in May 2016?
- In May 2016, “Allergen labelling” (requirement 4.2) was the most common: 37 restaurants had breaches of it.
- Have they fixed the breaches?
- Of the 75 restaurants with breaches in May 2016, 67 have a smiling face today (89.3%) – the breach was fixed at a later inspection. 0 still have a neutral or sad face, and 8 are no longer listed on the smiley site (data as of 7 Oct 2026).
Method and sources
- Source: Mattilsynet’s open data on smiley inspections (data.norge.no, licence CC BY 4.0) and the business register Enhetsregisteret (Brønnøysund Register Centre, NLOD), processed by Restoradar and refreshed every morning. Restoradar is not affiliated with Mattilsynet.
- “Breaches” are grade 2 (requires follow-up) and grade 3 (serious) – what Mattilsynet publishes on its smiley site. Minor remarks (grade 1) are not counted.
- A restaurant counts once in the month, however many inspections or breaches it had; a requirement counts each restaurant once. Places that have closed since are included; places removed at their own request are not.
- “Status today” is the current smiley result of the month’s restaurants as of 7 Oct 2026: a smiling face means a later inspection found no breaches that need follow-up.
- The report is generated from the data and updated with every import; a month is reported once it is over.
Source: Mattilsynet – smiley inspections and requirements (CC BY 4.0), Brønnøysund Register Centre – Enhetsregisteret (NLOD), processed by Restoradar. Data as of 7 Oct 2026. Restoradar is not affiliated with Mattilsynet.